Your financial independence number, often called your FI number, is an estimate of how much you would need invested so that your portfolio could cover your living costs without a paycheck. It turns a vague goal like “financial freedom someday” into a target you can measure progress against.
The most common shortcut is the 25x rule: multiply your annual spending by 25. It is quick and useful, but it is a rule of thumb built on historical research with specific assumptions, not a promise. Knowing where it comes from helps you use it sensibly and adjust it for your own situation.
This guide walks through the basic calculation, the research behind it, its limits, and several worked examples.
The basic formula
FI number = annual spending in retirement x 25
That is the same as dividing annual spending by 4% (0.04), because 1 / 0.04 = 25.
So if you expect to spend $40,000 a year:
- $40,000 x 25 = $1,000,000
- Check: 4% of $1,000,000 = $40,000
The logic is that in the first year you withdraw 4% of the starting portfolio, then in later years you adjust that dollar amount for inflation, while the remaining money stays invested.
Where the 25x rule comes from
The 25x rule is the flip side of what is often called the 4% rule. In 1994, financial planner William Bengen published research testing how much retirees could have withdrawn each year from a portfolio of US stocks and bonds, adjusting for inflation, without running out over 30-year periods in historical data. A later study by three professors at Trinity University, often called the Trinity study, examined similar questions with different portfolio mixes and withdrawal rates.
Roughly speaking, this research found that an initial withdrawal of about 4% of the portfolio, adjusted each year for inflation, would have lasted 30 years in most of the historical periods tested for portfolios with a substantial share of stocks. That finding became a popular rule of thumb.
The key words are historical, US, and 30 years. Past market returns are no promise of future ones, and your retirement may look different from the scenarios tested.
The limits of the 25x rule
Use the 25x rule as a starting point, then stress-test it against these limits.
- It was built for roughly 30-year retirements. If you plan to stop working at 40 or 45, your money may need to last 45 to 50 years or more. Many analysts suggest a lower withdrawal rate, such as 3% to 3.5%, for very long horizons.
- It relies on history. Future returns, inflation and interest rates may differ from the past. No one knows what the next 30 years will look like.
- It ignores fees. Investment fees reduce what you can safely withdraw. Every percentage point paid in fees is a percentage point not available to spend.
- It ignores taxes unless you include them. If your spending number is after tax, but withdrawals from traditional retirement accounts are taxed, you need more than 25x your spending.
- It assumes rigid spending. Real people can often cut back in bad years. Flexibility makes a plan more resilient, while rigid spending makes it more fragile.
- Sequence of returns matters. A big market drop early in retirement does more damage than the same drop later, because you are withdrawing while prices are low.
- It says nothing about other income. Social Security, a pension, rental income or part-time work can reduce how much your portfolio needs to provide.
Choosing a withdrawal rate
Because of those limits, many people calculate a range instead of one number. Here is what different withdrawal rates imply for someone spending $50,000 a year.
| Withdrawal rate | Multiple of spending | FI number for $50,000 spending |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0% | 20x | $1,000,000 |
| 4.0% | 25x | $1,250,000 |
| 3.5% | about 28.6x | about $1,428,600 |
| 3.0% | about 33.3x | about $1,666,700 |
The math: FI number = spending / withdrawal rate. For example, $50,000 / 0.035 = $1,428,571.
A lower withdrawal rate means a bigger target and more years of saving, but a larger margin of safety. A higher rate means reaching the goal sooner with more risk of running short. There is no single right answer, and a fee-only financial planner can help you test options against your situation.
Step-by-step: estimate your own FI number
- Find your current annual spending. Use 12 months of bank and card statements, not a guess. Include irregular costs like car repairs, gifts, travel and annual insurance premiums.
- Adjust for retirement. Some costs may drop (commuting, retirement contributions, possibly a mortgage). Others may rise (health insurance, especially in the US before Medicare eligibility, and travel or hobbies).
- Subtract other reliable income. If you expect a pension or part-time income, subtract it to find what the portfolio must provide. Social Security estimates are available from the Social Security Administration, but for early retirees it may not start for many years.
- Account for taxes. Estimate the taxes on your withdrawals and add them to the amount needed.
- Apply a withdrawal rate. Divide by 0.04 for the classic rule, or by a lower rate for a longer or more cautious plan.
Worked examples
All of these use illustrative numbers and are expressed in today’s dollars.
Example 1: a single person, classic rule
- Expected annual spending: $40,000
- FI number at 4%: $40,000 x 25 = $1,000,000
Example 2: a couple with part-time income
- Expected annual spending: $70,000
- One partner plans to keep part-time work earning $10,000 a year
- Portfolio needs to cover: $70,000 - $10,000 = $60,000
- FI number at 4%: $60,000 x 25 = $1,500,000
Without the part-time income, the number would be $70,000 x 25 = $1,750,000. That $10,000 of work income reduces the target by $250,000. This is the logic behind “Barista FIRE,” covered in what is FIRE.
Example 3: adding taxes
- Needed after tax: $50,000 a year
- Suppose taxes on withdrawals average 10% (an assumption; your rate depends on account types and tax law, which can change)
- Gross withdrawal needed: $50,000 / 0.90 = $55,556
- FI number at 4%: $55,556 x 25 = about $1,389,000
Ignoring taxes would have produced $1,250,000, an underestimate of nearly $140,000.
Example 4: an early retiree being cautious
- Expected spending: $45,000
- Planning a 50-year retirement, so using a 3.25% withdrawal rate
- FI number: $45,000 / 0.0325 = about $1,384,600
At the classic 4% rule the target would be $1,125,000. The cautious rate adds about $260,000 to the target.
How long will it take to get there?
Once you have a target, you can estimate a timeline. Suppose:
- Target: $1,000,000
- Already invested: $150,000
- Annual savings: $20,000
- Assumed return: 5% a year after inflation (an assumption, not a forecast)
Using the future value formula for a lump sum plus yearly contributions, the number of years n can be solved directly:
- (1.05)^n = (target x 0.05 + savings) / (current x 0.05 + savings)
- (1.05)^n = ($1,000,000 x 0.05 + $20,000) / ($150,000 x 0.05 + $20,000) = $70,000 / $27,500 = 2.545
- n = ln(2.545) / ln(1.05) = 0.934 / 0.0488 = about 19 years
If the same person could save $30,000 a year instead, the ratio becomes $80,000 / $37,500 = 2.133, and n drops to about 15.5 years. Because returns are not smooth, the real path will be bumpier and could be faster or slower. Your savings rate has a huge effect on this timeline, and the power of compound interest does more of the work the longer your money is invested.
Common mistakes
- Using today’s lifestyle without checking it. Guessing your spending instead of tracking it often understates it.
- Forgetting health care. For US early retirees, health insurance before Medicare can be a major line item.
- Treating the number as fixed. Your target will change as your life, prices and plans change. Recalculate at least once a year.
- Assuming high returns. Optimistic assumptions make the timeline look short and the plan look safe. Test conservative ones.
- Ignoring the order of withdrawals. Which accounts you draw from first can affect taxes and penalties. Rules for early withdrawals from retirement accounts are complex, so check IRS guidance or speak to a tax professional.
Key takeaways
- Your FI number estimates how much you need invested to cover your spending without a paycheck.
- The 25x rule (spending divided by 4%) comes from historical research on 30-year US retirements and is a rule of thumb, not a promise.
- Longer retirements, taxes, fees and rigid spending all argue for a bigger cushion or a lower withdrawal rate.
- Other income such as part-time work or a pension can substantially reduce the portfolio you need.
- Calculating a range of targets is more honest than relying on one precise number.
Next steps
- Pull 12 months of statements and total your real annual spending.
- Calculate your FI number at 4%, 3.5% and 3% to see the range.
- Adjust for expected taxes and any reliable other income.
- Estimate your timeline with a conservative return assumption, then revisit both numbers once a year.
This article is for general education only and is not financial, investment, tax or legal advice. All investing involves risk, including the possible loss of the money you invest. Consider speaking with a qualified professional about your own situation. See our editorial policy and disclaimer. Spotted an error? Email hello@minetofive.com.
